"The doctor's hands are more important than the interior." Spletnik discusses Agata Muceniece's 1 million ruble birth at an elite clinic.
The website Spletnik is discussing the birth of Agata Muceniece, who recently became a mother for the third time. The 36-year-old actress gave birth at an elite clinic popular with celebrities, where services cost up to 2.5 million rubles, and she had a private room with a bathtub and hammock. Now, in the comments, they're debating whether such expenses were justified, wondering who could have paid for the star's birth, and gossiping about the absence of Agata Muceniece's husband, Petr Dranga, in the discharge photo.
Many commenters were surprised by the clinic's prices. Many also noted that a high price does not guarantee a successful birth.
Titanium Station: "I wouldn't pay 2.5 million rubles for a maternity hospital, sorry. Yes, comfort, cleanliness, and experienced and polite doctors are very important, but 2.5 million for just furniture... Simply decent, clean furniture and comfort can cost much less."
Areadna: "Specifically, 350,000 [rubles], with a massage, a bath for water birth, and other optional extras—the average price in Moscow right now."
Irena_Cam: "The most important thing during childbirth isn't the hammock, but a good doctor. Everything depends on him. There are real-life examples of this where they spent a fortune on comfort, only to end up with a disabled child."
Not very noisy, but interested: "I agree... The doctor's hands are more important than all the interiors and disposable slippers; with a skilled doctor, you can give birth even in the field."
Kate Kate: "Does 2.5 million guarantee anything? I read somewhere that childbirth is pure roulette... P.S. Well, for 2.5 million you could have found a better deal for the woman giving birth."
grommit73: "The hammock was certainly worth the money, yes."
Some wondered who paid for the actress's stay at the elite clinic. Some also recalled rumors that Mutsenietse had an affair with a powerful man.
A random throwaway line: "Who paid for this luxury, Gref or Kerimov?"
Listoxa: "Did she give birth through barter?! Otherwise, it's hard to understand the publication of these photos."
Attitude: "Why does Agatha need all this? It's understandable if she was paid for advertising, but it's unclear when even the most intimate moments are turned inside out like this."
Others, however, noted that the photographs from the discharge do not include Muceniece's husband, musician Petra Dranga, whose relationship was once called fictitious.
Limpo: "Fiction from and to".
Archipianocat: "Where is the happy father?"
Ilonka09: "Where was the happy husband and father? In the maternity hospital, the husband always stands next to his wife. Usually holding the baby, because the wife is still weak after giving birth. I'm talking about normal, caring husbands."
Tekta: "My husband isn't at the hospital discharge. Draw your own conclusions, as they say."
However, some came to the actress's defense.
fi_alka: "There's no baby in the discharge notice either, pay attention and draw your own conclusions. It was sarcasm directed at the hens who didn't see the man in the photo and assumed he didn't exist. And the baby isn't in the photo, but that doesn't mean he doesn't exist. If she didn't post the photo, does that mean he didn't exist? That's social media nerdism."
nunurs1969: "Good health to mom and baby. I think Peter is over the moon."
Anna_st: "The main thing is that everyone stays alive and well—both mother and child."
As a reminder, Agata Muceniece became a mother again, as media reported in early December. She later contacted us, confirmed she had given birth to a girl, and showed off her postpartum figure. Three months before her daughter's birth, Agata married 41-year-old Dranga, for whom both marriage and the child were firsts. The actress has a son and a daughter from her first marriage to Pavel Priluchny, with whom she is in a protracted conflict.
Photo: agataagata/Instagram**
